In addition to your primary punishment, the court may additionally impose a fine to the offender. The fine’s amount is at the discretion with the court and is intended to serve as an additional deterrent.

fourteen. In the light from the position explained higher than, it can be concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be regarded as for no fault of his individual and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency while in the length of service or while in the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mold the relief to make it correct towards the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified with the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID needed) to criminal and traffic case information from the general district courts to the purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.

Because of their position between the two main website systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as mixed systems of law.

The presiding judge emphasised the need to address the evolving techniques used by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological areas allows to get a more thorough legal reaction.

                                                                  

There are plenty of situations where death was never meant – even more where those nominated while in the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of the human being is often a tragic event. However the death of any dwelling being is not any significantly less a tragic event.

P.C. Liability of petitioners for the mentioned offences would be determined with the acquired trial Court after sifting the evidentiary truly worth in the material manufactured before the same. Till then, case of

I)       The above referred case FIR, for your murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered to the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who is father on the petitioner and According to story of FIR, the petitioner is surely an eyewkness with the event.

The scrupulous reader may perhaps have noticed a thing earlier mentioned: a flaw. Past the first 7 words, the definition focuses about the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The 2 simple elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of a crime are “

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

Здесь представлены рекомендации и описания способов лечения данным заболеванием.

115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 in the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set via the government.